mudcat.org: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafeawe

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50]


BS: Brexit & other UK political topics

Steve Shaw 12 May 21 - 11:48 AM
Dave the Gnome 12 May 21 - 11:32 AM
Steve Shaw 12 May 21 - 09:15 AM
Dave the Gnome 12 May 21 - 08:05 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 May 21 - 06:15 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 May 21 - 06:08 AM
DMcG 12 May 21 - 05:56 AM
Nigel Parsons 12 May 21 - 05:55 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 May 21 - 05:34 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 May 21 - 05:27 AM
Steve Shaw 12 May 21 - 05:10 AM
SPB-Cooperator 12 May 21 - 05:05 AM
Dave the Gnome 12 May 21 - 03:44 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 May 21 - 12:27 AM
Donuel 11 May 21 - 06:41 PM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 06:31 PM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 04:04 PM
Allan Conn 11 May 21 - 01:55 PM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 11:28 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 11:24 AM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 09:31 AM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 09:25 AM
Backwoodsman 11 May 21 - 08:40 AM
Donuel 11 May 21 - 08:35 AM
DMcG 11 May 21 - 07:52 AM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 06:25 AM
Steve Shaw 11 May 21 - 06:14 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 06:09 AM
punkfolkrocker 11 May 21 - 05:59 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 05:21 AM
Backwoodsman 11 May 21 - 05:03 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 04:16 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 04:13 AM
The Sandman 11 May 21 - 03:50 AM
DMcG 11 May 21 - 03:48 AM
Backwoodsman 11 May 21 - 03:32 AM
Backwoodsman 11 May 21 - 03:23 AM
Dave the Gnome 11 May 21 - 02:53 AM
Steve Shaw 10 May 21 - 08:47 PM
Nigel Parsons 10 May 21 - 08:35 PM
Steve Shaw 10 May 21 - 06:03 PM
Dave the Gnome 10 May 21 - 04:44 PM
Dave the Gnome 10 May 21 - 04:39 PM
Nigel Parsons 10 May 21 - 04:17 PM
punkfolkrocker 10 May 21 - 03:47 PM
punkfolkrocker 10 May 21 - 03:21 PM
Allan Conn 10 May 21 - 02:45 PM
DMcG 10 May 21 - 11:53 AM
Allan Conn 10 May 21 - 11:39 AM
Steve Shaw 10 May 21 - 11:11 AM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:






Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 May 21 - 11:48 AM

Well I guess the Tommy Robinson quip got me scratching my head a bit, but knowing that pfr is basically an all-round good egg I chose not to do any interpretive delving...

Yeah, we need a Prescott. A dodgy geezer at times but nowhere near as dodgy as the current twat in charge, and PMQs would have been nothing if not highly entertaining...

If I could ask Sir Keir just the one question, it would be "What have you got against feisty, grassroots northern working-class women?"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 May 21 - 11:32 AM

I'm not just Polish though, Steve. Grandad was a Russian Orthodox priest who died of ill health brought on by mistreatment by Russian communists and having to leave Poland in a hurry because of the Nazis. When Grandad was incarcerated in Russia for his beliefs, Grandma had to make her own way back to Poland, on foot, with 2 young children, sleeping in ditches and living off the land. Beat that you buggers!

Apologies to all, especially PFR, for being a bit tetchy. I have been under considerable stress of late and, while that has lessened, it has been replaced with a whole new worry. Not ready to discuss yet but I assure all that if I have caused any offence, it is not anything you have done.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 May 21 - 09:15 AM

Right, yer buggers, I'm getting in on this Polish malarkey,.. My best mate at school was a Pole (we are still in touch), and I spent many a long evening at the Polish club in Bury (I also frequently inhabited the ones in Bolton and Rochdale). I met a lovely young Polish woman at the Bury club and we went out for several years, eventually getting engaged (she called it off much to my chagrin, but I rapidly ended up with Mrs Steve for the next 45 years and counting!). Many of their parents were Polish emigrťs and they were all Catholics, big time. I was one of the few non-Poles in their social circle. They were nearly all viciously anti-Polish Jew, for reasons they didn't always make clear. Funnily enough, when I started teaching in London one of my best boozing buddies was the son of Polish-Jewish emigrťs... He didn't give a flying fart about those ingrained animosities... I never did get my head round all that lot... I must have sung that Sto Lat song a thousand times, without having a clue what I was singing about!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 May 21 - 08:05 AM

PFR - back atcher - What do you think I have accused you of? Maybe if you "actually read what was clearly intended, rather than getting het up over what you thought I meant" you may have seen that it was the Tommy Robinson comment you made that is the contentious point.

So, where is Labour's present day equivalents of a John Prescott,
or even a lefty tommy robinson...???

Straight talking proud, defiant, charismatic, politicians...


Reads remarkably like the odious Robinson is a straight talking proud, defiant, charismatic polition.

When you later go on to say

a specific character type, irrespective of any political persuasion, who is a popular leader and figurehead for certain social demographics..

Which 'certain social demographics do you believe will be influenced by the likes of Tommy Robinson?

I must admit though that you made me laugh when you tried to take the piss of background story and then attempted to trump it with your link about Polish Jews. Is there a 4 Jews, story? Gas chambers? Bloody luxury... :-D


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 May 21 - 06:15 AM

btw..


.. before anyone else makes the mistake of tarring me
with far right extremism..

This is where the Polish branch of my family tree came to an abrupt end...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 May 21 - 06:08 AM

DMcG - Fair cop.. I've never had a good memory for details...

If so, time for a rule change..

A new Leader needs to select a reliable deputy they can get on with and trust.
Stabilty at the very top of the party is absolutely essential...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: DMcG
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:56 AM

Corbyn was utterly stupid from the start appointing his judas watson as sidekick...

If I remember rightly, he didn't. Watson was elected by the Labour party memebership, so in a way it is a mirror image of Starmer and Rayner.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:55 AM

Labour leaders, any leaders, need deputies they can trust and rely on to have their backs
at all times..

Like Batman and Alfred.. Sherlock and Watson..
Blair & Brown? Julius Caesar & Brutus/Cassius/Casca . . .


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:34 AM

ps..

Labour leaders, any leaders, need deputies they can trust and rely on to have their backs
at all times..

Like Batman and Alfred.. Sherlock and Watson..

Corbyn was utterly stupid from the start appointing his judas watson as sidekick...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:27 AM

DtG - working classier than thou

Never mind the kneejerks...

At what point in my post, or any time in my life,
have I ever condoned or advocated
the kind of extremism and sterotypes you have just gone off on one accusing me about...!!!???

I am clearly only talking about a certain kind of charismatic individuals with character and background,
who are more captivating to ex Labour voters..

Successful right wing influencers are very good at seducing ordinary working class, and middle class folks..

I've perhaps wasted far more time than you
studying the bastards on the internet...???
Empirical research...

.. tommy was a tongue in cheek, though still serious, pointer
towards a specific character type, irrespective of any political persuasion,
who is a popular leader and figurehead for certain social demographics..

I qualified it with obvious "lefty" and "???"s
if you'd actually read what was clearly intended,
rather than getting het up over
what you thought I meant...

Maybe I could have gone even further and suggested adolf...!!!???

The point still remains, who the f@ck can Labour put up to fill that void
to fight fire with fire..

Could anyone like John Prescott even stand a chance
to rise up the Party hierarchy anymore,
as dominated as it seems by middle class careerists..


OPTIMISM


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:10 AM

You could almost be describing Rayner as leader and Starmer as deputy, pfr...but a cautiinary note here...when we had a leftie leader (Corbyn) and a right-wing deputy (Watson) it didn't go well, did it? Whilst Corbyn tried to maintain his dignity, Watson made it abundantly clear to the world that he didn't want to be associated with him. I ask again - who really ARE the splitters in the party?

I must say, I wasn't too comfy with your lefty Tommy Robinson either. Not quite sure what you had in mind there...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: SPB-Cooperator
Date: 12 May 21 - 05:05 AM

The only difference with low-income and wealthy people 'pissing money against the wall' is that the wealthy waste a lot more and still have more money left over than they know what to do with.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 May 21 - 03:44 AM

PFR - Why should us working class folk accept "left wing Tommy Robinsons"? Extremism in any form is a anathema. I was brought up on council estates in Salford and like Steve spent my early years in a 2 up 2 down street entranced terrace with no bathroom. My Dad, a Polish painter and decorator, spent his life here as a union activist and Labour supporter while hating fascists and communists with equal venom. I worked in the building trade from doing holiday jobs labouring to being a site inspector for Manchester council until I discovered I was better at IT. Yet I would never dream of supporting an extremist of any ilk. Your depiction of the working class being drudges who live in the gutter, piss their money up the wall and are easily swayed by populism is as out of touch as the very politicians you are railing against. What I and many like me want is a government that looks after everyone's interests equally. Not populist trickery from any side.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 May 21 - 12:27 AM

For some time I've been one of the folks consistently criticising the Labour party
for becoming over-run by santimonious academic ideologues,
and smarmy affluent middle class professional political & business suit 'n' tie clones..

So it's their party now...!!!???

A Labour party disdainful of, and preaching scornfully down at the rough, un-PC, working class


No real surprise then, original traditional Labour voters
have become so alienated by this unwelcome invasion of snooty elitist 'superiors and betters',
that they've became easy exploited target mass converts for the oportunist populist far right...

Now as despicable as they are, our enemy, far right organisers and influencers
have proven time again they have far more political awareness and intelligence
than the out of touch Labour party upper hierarchy,
who the working class can no longer identify with...

So, where is Labour's present day equivalents of a John Prescott,
or even a lefty tommy robinson...???

Straight talking proud, defiant, charismatic, politicians..

One of 'us'.. council estate born and raised..
celebrating our rebellious unpretensious working class culture, and vulgar disrespectful sense of humour...

Genuinely authentic down to earth politicians who can appeal to and inspire
the generation of former Labour voters who are now sick of the Labour party,
and flocking to good time geezer boris - and his 'couldn't give a shit about petty rules and laws' personality...

Like it or not, that's the role model so many lost labour voters now aspire to..

boris and the far right understand this, goody two shoes moralistic Labour don't..

I'd suggest the likes of Starmer, would probably be better practical use as Deputy Labour leaders...???
Using their upper echelon establishment professional finesse and contacts network,
to support, protect, and guide, a real working class Labour leader
through the nest of vipers that is parliament and british media...

.. But... oh well.. back to depressing reality.....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Donuel
Date: 11 May 21 - 06:41 PM

Woof, I have been like little lord Fauntelroy in comparison and have had a easy ride and childhood.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 06:31 PM

"The people walking into food banks to feed their kids, the ones struggling to find the rent, the people suffering on hospital waiting lists, etc., etc. donít give a shit about about high-handed preaching by those who consider themselves politically and ideologically superior..."

"...unlike us comfortably-well-off ex-teachers, retired accountants, IT consultants, yadda yadda..."

For the first ten years of my life I lived in a slum infested with beetles, with no hot water tap and an outside toilet that froze up every winter. Latchkey kid. There was a flooded mine shaft five yards from my front door in which a four-year-old boy drowned while I lived there. My last primary school class had 48 kids in it. We were bloody hard up, and so what if I've done well to get myself out of that. My head has never been in the clouds about the rampant inequalities in our society and I've stood on picket lines in the freezing cold at six in the morning to support school cleaners, hospital workers and firemen. I have never not been a trade unionist. You call for party unity. That happened under Blair for a time. During that time the chasm between the rich and poor got ever wider. Go figure, huh?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 04:04 PM

So Mandelson has suggested to Starmer that he severs links with trade unions and left-wing factions. You see? That's the right of the party's idea of "unity..."

Sounds like Angela Rayner (scared to call her Angie...Sorry, Angie...) was hopping mad with Keir at the weekend. She certainly got the better of him. Her team (though not her) have even suggested that she could challenge him for the leadership. Now how great would that be!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Allan Conn
Date: 11 May 21 - 01:55 PM

Donuel what do you mean by there hasn't been a border since Hadrian's Wall. The Scottish/English border ceased officially being an international border in 1707.!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 11:28 AM

Second BTW. What happened to being done with this and not losing any friends?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 11:24 AM

Yes, John. We do need to pull together. In which direction are you suggesting we pull? Right or left? If something is being pulled in opposite directions, then at least 2 people are doing it. Which is right and which is wrong?

BTW, I have met Becky on a number of occasions and she wouldn't mind the familiarity at all. She is a lot closer to those working class grass roots that you hold so dear than Sir Keir. And it is quite noticeable where the bad feeling in this thread seems to be emanating from.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 09:31 AM

By the way, in the party they are Angie and Becky. My daughter is called Rebecca. The only person who ever calls her that is her mother, and even then only when she's angry. They would have made a dream team, instead of which we've got stodge on toast. Two northern working-class women at the top of a socialist-leaning party. What a shot in the arm for our politics that would have been. Boris would have been pooping his pantaloons every bloody week.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 09:25 AM

Who were the people in the party who, for years, got the bit between their teeth over the completely false allegations of Corbyn's antisemitism? Who ditched Ken Livingstone? Do you think they were honest brokers? What about the ones who kept silent and let it rumble? Don't you think they knew what damage they were doing? Anything to unseat Corbyn, even a disastrous election defeat was worth it? Allowing the Mail open season on Corbyn and not standing up to it? These are the very people who now blame the left for divisions and bleat about unity at any price. Well let me tell you, it'll be a while, and at least some of us want to see principle re-established in the party and a leadership that is not constantly behind the curve and which only seems to know how to behave expediently and divisively. That's where most of the effort to unify the party needs to come from, and by effort I don't mean sacking lefties. If Labour can't be a left-wing party, and I don't mean hard left, then it may as well not exist.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 11 May 21 - 08:40 AM

Jesus, Mary, Joseph, and the wee fuckiní donkey!

No, for fuckís sake, Iím not talking about Ďbacking Starmerí - thatís the spin you keep putting on it. Please stop the spinning. Iím saying that the Party and the needs of those it exists to serve are far more important than Personalities. When Corbyn was the leader, despite my own personal view that he was just about the worst possible man for the job - weak, ineffectual, a lousy public speaker, made mincemeat of by May and Johnson at PMQs Wednesday after Wednesday, incapable of putting the smears and slurs against him to bed - I spoke up for him and, when he was under attack from within the Party I said exactly the same things that Iím saying now, that the in-fighting should stop and the Party should pull together to defeat the Tories. And if that means supporting a leader whoís not my particular preference, so be it - I did it for Corbyn, and Iíll do it no matter who the leader is. Party before Personality.

The people walking into food banks to feed their kids, the ones struggling to find the rent, the people suffering on hospital waiting lists, etc., etc. donít give a shit about about high-handed preaching by those who consider themselves politically and ideologically superior, they couldnít care less about ĎBeckyí and ĎAngieí (come off it with the faux-familiarity Steve, donít be a pillock - you donít know them, never even met them, and in public itís Rebecca and Angela). What they care about is the difference a Labour government would make to their miserable lives - any Labour government is better than the Tories unless youíre made of money.

So please stop the bullshit, stop the spinning of my words, and think about the people for whom - unlike us comfortably-well-off ex-teachers, retired accountants, IT consultants, yadda yadda - having a Labour government instead of the permanent Tory rule that Labour Party civil-war will subject them to could be a dream come true.

But I guess youíll only hear what you want to hear, see what you want to see - leopards donít change their spots.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Donuel
Date: 11 May 21 - 08:35 AM

OK no one blames the Scots and a loss of seats would imblance the rest of England but people over here ask, "Will there be a new border?"
There hasn't been one since Hadrian's wall.
I suppose since its not a done deal its too soon to say.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: DMcG
Date: 11 May 21 - 07:52 AM

That's fair enough, Steve, and I don't guarantee it would work of course. But the alliance I suggested is very short term - maybe as short as a month. It has one purpose only: to change from FTP to a proportional system. Thereafter, as I said, there would be another election and in that you could vote for whoever you wished. You would not be tied to LibDem for four or five years.

We all recognise, I think, that without the Labour party reunifying somehow, the Tories will stay in power long term under FPTP. Some want the Labour party to unify to the left, some to the centre. So it does not unify at all while that argument goes on. What way out of the impasse do you suggest that recognises not everyone will agree with one preferred idea of what Labour should be?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 06:25 AM

"The only way out of this is to form an alliance of at least Labour, LibDem, Green and SNP."

That would condemn me to voting for the LibDems round here. I did that six times in general elections to try to keep out the Tory. Last time I did it, in 2010, the LibDem candidate's repeated (ad nauseam) mantra was "Don't let the Tories in here." Well whaddya know. He got elected, and they ditched their principles and went into an unholy and opportunistic alliance with the Tories, which he supported. Progressive party my arse. It's a cliche, but the LibDems showed themselves to be a bunch of naive Tory-lites, and the one delicious thing about the 2015 election was that they got their just deserts. I don't wish to be disenfranchised via the unholy alliance you're suggesting, thanks. In fact, the first thing I'd do is tear up my membership card.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 May 21 - 06:14 AM

Thing is, John, you've laid your cards on the table time and time again to tell us what a disaster you think Corbyn and his ilk have been. So what you're really saying is, come on, lefties, ditch your principles and throw your lot in with the (establishment Tory-lite) centre of the party. Be seen to be evaporating. Ain't happening. This party grew from working-class trade union roots and it's the Blairs/Browns/Milibands/Starmers who are wanting to usurp the party name and ditch that history, as if it's some kind of embarrassment. I joined this party when Jeremy Corbyn became leader because I thought I could see a resurgence of what Labour should really be about, a left-wing party of principle (I'm still clinging on in hope...). If you want an anodyne centre party, join the LibDems. Oh, and let's not forget what happened to them when they went for "unity" with the Tories. Or the SDP when they went for "unity" with the Liberals...

And I'm still waiting to have it explained to me how suspending Jeremy Corbyn on spurious grounds, sacking Becky Long-Bailey on spurious grounds and scapegoating Angie Rayner are going to advance the cause of party unity. I ask for the third time: who really ARE the splitters in the party?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 06:09 AM

Becky would have fitted the bill but we missed that bus :-(


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 11 May 21 - 05:59 AM

But if starmer was best choice from a mediocre bunch;

who is there to oust him and inspire the whole nation...?????

.. ie, not just middle class elite student union politics 'socialists'...


Is there a ready and waiting down to earth charismatic potential leader,
who can win sufficient 'working class' votes back from the populist right ...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 05:21 AM

Agreed, John. The Labour party needs to become electable. You seem to be saying that is by getting behind Starmer. I disagree and, by the performance last Thursday, it seems that the electorate prefer Johnson to Starmer. How will getting behind the current leader halp that situation?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 11 May 21 - 05:03 AM

No Dave, Iím talking about the LP, not Johnson. Iím not taking one side, Iím not pitting R v. L, no matter how others try to spin what I say. Iím saying that everyone, no matter their Ďleaningí, needs to get together to unite the Labour Party and make it electable, so that it can rid the country of this foul scourge of Conservative government. Sadly, there seems to be more interest here in student-ideology and an obsession with membership numbers. Iíll say it again and again until certain people get it...

1) Members donít elect governments, the voting public elect governments. So boasting about membership numbers is nothing more than vanity.

2) The unseemly spectacle of two opposing elements within the party ripping each othersí faces off is unlikely to attract voters to vote Labour, rather the opposite.

3) Unless and until the LP attracts sufficient votes to form a government, it is failing the very people it exists to represent - the poor, the disadvantaged, the disenfranchised. And it is failing those of us who trusted it with our votes.

4) People are putting personalities, together with their rather naive ideology and dogma, before Party, and before the needs of the country. Thereís a need for some grown-up old-fashioned pragmatism, the lack of which is risking the Labour Party becoming completely irrelevant.

The Party is bigger than any one member or group of members, and it must be ĎParty before Personalityí. Every time.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 04:16 AM

Besides, your comments seem to be echoing a certain mantra that some have used before. We got more votes and you lost. Get over it. Surely not? :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 04:13 AM

Sorry John but following your logic, as Bozzer got more crosses than anyone else, we all need to unite behind him. What you are saying is that the lesser of two evils, ie Tory light as opposed to Tory right, is good. Fair enough, that is your opinion and I can see the logic in it. I would prefer to see the right wing politics currently prevalent across both major parties opposed and I think that can still be done.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: The Sandman
Date: 11 May 21 - 03:50 AM

yes good idea dmcg i look at the country i was born in and i thank god i escaped but i still feel so sad


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: DMcG
Date: 11 May 21 - 03:48 AM

As expected, it seems like Johnson will be bringing ending the Fixed Parliament Act into the Queens speech. Doing so was a manifesto commitment, so he is perfectly entitled to do that. Like many commentators I think he will call the election in 2023, though the back end of 2022 does not seem impossible. That gives Labour very little time to sort itself out, and a year of squabbles will play into Johnson's hands very nicely.

I go along with John Curtice. The only way out of this is to form an alliance of at least Labour, LibDem, Green and SNP. All stand in the next election under one banner of, let's say, "True Democracy". There would be only one candidate from TD in each constituency and there would be one item in their manifesto, namely introducing proportional representation then calling another election once that had been voted for. Thereafter, each revert to their normal parties or reorganise themselves as they see fit. I have ideas how to decide who stands for TD in each ward, and how Parliamentary jobs are allocated, but that is fine detail: it is the broad brush that matters.


I can't see it happening, myself!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 11 May 21 - 03:32 AM

Second thoughts...

Membership numbers are vanity.
Votersí crosses are sanity.
Government is King!

Not much chance of the third element while the first seems to be more important to some people than the second.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 11 May 21 - 03:23 AM

To paraphrase a business-slogan I learned many years ago...

Membership numbers are vanity.
Votersí crosses are sanity.
Party unity is King!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 May 21 - 02:53 AM

Steve, the electorate in the leadership contest reached over 600000 as per the BBC article I linked. That is probably what you saw. As I said to Nigel, mistakes such as that matter little compared to deliberately misleading the country for your own benefit.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 10 May 21 - 08:47 PM

I didn't ever believe that all those people suddenly joined, Nigel. I should have said that the numbers rose to... And whether I was a bit optimistic or not kind of depends how, who and when you count. I was in the ballpark and I can be no further arsed.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 10 May 21 - 08:35 PM

It takes the potential total electorate in the leadership contest to 610,753.
Took me aabout 15 seconds to find that on Google.
I fully accept that 600000 people did not join the party then but there were over 600000 members.


It doesn't even make a claim for 600,000+ members (rather than the claim of 600,000 new members) as it goes on to say (about the figure of 610,753) that: Labour says checks are still taking place on all new members to weed out non-party supporters. That is presumably why they quote the figure as 'potential'.

As to it being pointless correcting Steve. If the original statement is allowed to stand then others can claim that they read it somewhere, and claim it as fact. Which is what Steve also appears to have been doing (mistakenly).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 10 May 21 - 06:03 PM

Yes, it was careless of me to say "joined the party." A quick shufty around found this (Rowena Mason in 2019 in the Guardian):

"Figures from the partyís latest accounts show it had 518,659 members in December 2018, down from a peak of 564,443 the previous year."

I heard 600,000 somewhere but I can't find it, and I'm not inclined to spend more time on it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 10 May 21 - 04:44 PM

...and before you start rabbiting on about the importance of accuracy you need to bear in mind that Steve probably made a mistake on an insignificant internet forum that makes no difference whatsoever to peoples livelihoods. Compare that to the record of your hero.

The lies, falsehoods and misrepresentations of Boris Johnson


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 10 May 21 - 04:39 PM

You didn't look very hard, Nigel.

Labour leadership: Huge increase in party's electorate

From the BBC article - Labour received more than 160,000 applications to vote in its leadership contest in the final 24 hours of registrations, the party has said.

The number of applications via trade unions more than doubled and the number of party members and £3 registered supporters also rose.

It takes the potential total electorate in the leadership contest to 610,753.


Took me aabout 15 seconds to find that on Google.

I fully accept that 600000 people did not join the party then but there were over 600000 members. There was a massive surge and the membership has now declined under Starmer.

As ever, if all you can do is nit pick at flawed wording, your argument is lost.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 10 May 21 - 04:17 PM

Steve: 600,000 people joined the party when Jeremy became leader.
Is there any evidence of that claim?
Nowhere that I can find ever shows the recent total membership in that range, let alone a sudden surge of that amount.
According to The House of Commons As of July 2019, Labour had 485,000 members,

I can see a prediction of total membership of that value in The New Statesman : Labour membership is on course to hit 600,000, a half-century peak, after a second successive day in which more than 100,000 people have applied to become party members. That does seem to imply that 600,000 may have been the membership 50 years ago though.

And according to The Guardian The membership level had fallen in 2019 from 518,659 at end of 2018 to a figure which remained above 500,000 as at August 2019


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 10 May 21 - 03:47 PM

I'll just add that some folks hold the opinion that Nicola Sturgeon
might have been a formidable leader of the Labour party.

Who knows what positive benefits she could have achieved for all of Britain if she wasn't so parochially obsessed...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 10 May 21 - 03:21 PM

But surely a strong confident labour majority govt,
or even Labour in opposition, still holding those nearly 60 lost Scottish seats,
would be a far more effective convincing intimidating foe for the tories..

A counter argument is that smaller left of centre parties,
would be of more use in fighting tory perpetual domination,
if they swallow their egos, pride, and separatist policy obsessions,
by joining as members of the allegedly broad church Labour party...???

Strength in numbers, and all that...

Otherwise, tories will always win when they can divide and rule...

Pragmatically, a two party system is better than the one party system which we will end up with after a few more years under the tories;
laughing their bollocks off at the left fragmenting into piddling little factions and single issue parties...

Right then, give it a few more years see what happens up north of the border,
then have another think about the Wessex and Cornish separatist movements..

OK.. yes, they'd still end up just as dominated by ruling class west country tories..

Nothing ever changes for the better around here in Scrumpyshire...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Allan Conn
Date: 10 May 21 - 02:45 PM

Yeah the split thing was a possibility with the SNP and Salmond's Alba party. Despite the media hype didn't amount to anything. Salmond being even less popular than Boris is within Scotland now didn't help their cause.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: DMcG
Date: 10 May 21 - 11:53 AM

Though even though it benefits them they support the ending of first past the post.

I heard a lecture by John Curtice weeks ago where he suggested the only real route to power for Labour was to form an alliance with parties looking for electoral reform. When that happens the two wings of Labour could separate and not ultimately split the left vote. The experience with the SDP and Change UK and others shows such splits without electoral reform do not work.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Allan Conn
Date: 10 May 21 - 11:39 AM

Re the figures from the Blair/Brown years.

In 1997 Labour won 418 seats against 241 for the other parties. So they had a majority of 177. Scotland sent 56 Labour seats to Westminster against 16 from other parties. So there was a big majority without the Scottish members.

In 2001 Labour won 412 seats against 247 for the other parties. So they had a majority of 165. Scotland again sent 56 Labour seats to Westminster against 16 from other parties. So there was a big majority without the Scottish members.

In 2005 Labour won 355 seats against 291 for the other parties. So they had a majority of 64. Scotland again sent 41 Labour seats to Westminster against 18 from other parties. So there was again a safe enough majority without the Scottish members.

Just showing that historically it was not true that Scottish Labour MPS are required for returning a Labour gvt.

Plus the idea that the huge Labour contingents used to reflect Scottish opinion doesn't stand either. In 1997 the 78% of the Scottish seats were gained by only 45% of the actual vote.

The SNP currently gets this advantage of sending a representation to Westminster which is away above their % share of the vote. Though even though it benefits them they support the ending of first past the post.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Brexit & other UK political topics
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 10 May 21 - 11:11 AM

I'm certain that that first word was a typo, Allan!

I wasn't suggesting a super-majority setup. That's one thing Johnson definitely wouldn't get away with, after such a thing was not permitted for the brexit vote, despite protests. I was speaking hypothetically.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 6 December 9:39 AM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Cafť Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.